As Israeli attacks on Lebanon intensified throughout March 2026, increasingly targeting densely populated civilian areas, the casualty toll rose to 1,268 deaths and 3,750 injuries, according to a report by the Public Health Emergency Operations Center issued on March 31. Additionally, approximately 1.5 million people have been forcibly displaced.
Among the dead and injured are Syrian refugees, including entire families. A tragic example occurred in Temnin el-Tahta in the Bekaa Valley on March 11, where more than 10 people —including women and children— were killed in an Israeli airstrike that targeted their residence at dawn on Wednesday. Only meters away from the rubble, media footage showed dozens of Syrian refugee families living in fragile tents amidst dwindling survival options, while tens of thousands more have fled for their lives, leaving everything behind.
Arabic Version
The original version of this content is available in Arabic on my other platform. To view it, please click the link below:
Syrian refugees, who originally fled the horrors of war in their homeland seeking sanctuary, now face an even more precarious and complex reality. Risks to their lives are escalating, and the difficulty of relocating to alternative shelters in safer areas is compounded by deteriorating socio-economic conditions. This crisis undermines the core of the Right to Life, Liberty, and Security of Person, as guaranteed by Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Under these mounting pressures and the total absence of alternative options in the host country, some refugees may feel compelled to make the abrupt decision to return to Syria. This occurs despite lingering uncertainty regarding the availability of infrastructure, basic services, livelihood guarantees, and even general safety and stability.
Analytical insight suggests that the ongoing return of Syrian refugees does not meet the criteria for sustainability. Instead, it is taking place within a widening gap between declared protection frameworks and the actual reality on the ground, leaving returnees exposed to the very "multi-dimensional vulnerabilities" that originally drove their displacement.
Approach and Methodology
To diagnose this complex reality and understand the rapid shifts in the choices of Syrian refugees and recent returnees —amidst diverging narratives and field conditions— a set of field indicators was extracted between February 24 and March 23, 2026. This was achieved using an in-house Digital Trace Listening (DTL) tool. The tool relies on systematic qualitative analysis of unstructured, geographically distributed text data, including public digital interactions and voluntary testimonies received via private communication. This data is analyzed through a classification system built on interactive data sheets.
This analysis is centered on the concept of the "Protection Gap," which reflects the disparity between declared commitments and the actual capacity to ensure access to services and support —including information, aid, and livelihoods— during both the displacement and return phases.
Furthermore, this approach aligns with the conclusions of the Executive Committee of the UNHCR Programme from its 75th session (October 2024), specifically paragraph (i/7). This paragraph calls for supporting and facilitating systems and tools that enhance durable solutions, including intention surveys and the collection and analysis of comprehensive, high-quality data monitoring refugee needs, in accordance with data protection and privacy principles.
These indicators carry particular weight following the mid-March acknowledgment by the UNHCR in Lebanon regarding "delays and difficulties" in providing cash return grants, as well as the postponement of organized voluntary return trips due to the security situation. This was accompanied by the agency advising refugees to make their "own decisions regarding return."
In this context, the data highlights what it practically means for individuals to be left to make life-altering decisions in the absence of guarantees, protection, safe alternatives, and reliable communication channels.
The Situation in Lebanon
Syrian refugees in Lebanon find themselves facing escalating pressures as the effectiveness of the UN protection umbrella wanes. Indicators suggest that access to services and support is hindered by recurrent obstacles and extended delays, which limit the ability of individuals to follow up on their requests or obtain clear information. Simultaneously, they are subjected to a narrative of "blame," pressuring them to return to a place where safe alternatives are non-existent.
The Institutional Wall of Silence
Based on a sample of Syrian refugees in Lebanon, indicators show that 27% suffered a total cutoff in communication channels with the international agencies mandated to protect them, specifically UNHCR. Among them, 13% citing technical barriers in communication mechanisms and 14% reporting a complete lack of response to requests, inquiries, or consultations. This coincides with 65% of the same sample reporting the absence of any effective humanitarian response on the ground.
"I have lived in Lebanon for 14 years; I have children, and there is no aid. I changed my residence four times this year. I tried to contact UNHCR repeatedly, but the response was always automated. When I went to their office, I was denied entry on the grounds that I did not have a prior appointment."
_Field Testimony
Testimonies within the sample indicate that many remain in their usual locations despite their areas being repeatedly targeted. Reasons include an unwillingness to return to Syria, the inability to afford transportation costs, or the lack of safe alternatives.
"I have lived in Lebanon for 13 years, and our house in Syria is destroyed. Where would we go? Unfortunately, I will not leave my home; we are very close to the direct strike zones, along with my family and children."
_Field Testimony
This reality reflects a clear gap in access to information and support, contradicting the UNHCR Executive Committee Conclusion No. 75 (paragraph i/4), which emphasizes ensuring refugees' access to information, counseling, and legal support. Furthermore, paragraph (g) of the same conclusion calls for identifying specific obstacles and challenges to achieving durable solutions—particularly for those in vulnerable situations—and working with them to implement measures to overcome these barriers.
"I contacted UNHCR to request legal advice; they said they would get back to me later, but they never contacted me again."
_Field Testimony
The Blame Indicator
When expanding the sample to include all indicators centered on Syrian refugees in Lebanon —including their testimonies and the discourse surrounding them across all sources and locations— the "Victim-Blaming Index" recorded 25%, with 12% taking an explicitly aggressive tone. These narratives intersected through social, financial, and political stigmatization, mostly exerting pressure for immediate return while completely ignoring existing risks or the scarcity of available alternatives.
Protection Gap and Emergency Response
At the heart of these challenges was the UNHCR Lebanon message issued on March 13, which left the decision to remain in Lebanon, relocate within the country, or return to Syria to the refugees themselves. The agency justified this by stating the situation is "very difficult for many families" and noted delays and difficulties in providing cash return grants.
A subsequent UNHCR message issued on April 1 confirmed this ongoing approach, stating that the agency may provide a one-time cash grant of $100 USD per person upon return, following a brief assessment. It invited those wishing to return to inform the agency and contact relevant centers. Both messages noted the postponement of organized voluntary return trips scheduled for March and April. This indicates that the proposed support is not provided as a fixed entitlement but rather as a conditional procedure subject to assessment and probability, further increasing the state of uncertainty among refugees.
This trend raises questions regarding the fulfillment of "meaningful participation" for refugees in matters affecting them, as stipulated in Conclusion (l) of the UNHCR Executive Committee, which requires their active involvement in decisions regarding their fate rather than leaving them to face dire circumstances alone.
"I am a 58-year-old widow living with my daughter and her minor children. We have no breadwinner and are very close to the direct strike zones. We have no home and no ability to afford the cost of return. We need someone to help us leave safely and return voluntarily."
_Field Testimony
Reflections on the "Freedom of Decision"
Analytical readings of the field reality show that a Syrian refugee suffering from extreme poverty does not have the luxury of "personal choice" when trapped under the fire of escalation, coupled with a total inability to secure exorbitant transportation costs, a lack of safe alternatives, and a deprivation of logistical and financial support. These factors, combined with barriers in UN communication and emergency response mechanisms, turn the concept of "freedom of choice" into a dangerous protection vacuum. This undermines the practical essence of the Principle of Non-Refoulement enshrined in Article 33 of the 1951 Convention; the absence of protection and socio-economic pressure constitute an "indirect push" toward uninformed return, contradicting international standards that require a safe and dignified environment before return options are presented.
My UN paper expired a year ago. Every time we call, they tell us they will set an appointment. We have been in this state for a year; what are we supposed to do?"
_Field Testimony
The UNHCR Executive Committee (75th Session, Conclusion b) emphasized the need to create conditions conducive to voluntary repatriation in safety and dignity, based on a free and informed choice. In this context, protection gaps in the country of asylum directly impact the decisions and conditions of return, which is clearly reflected in the ongoing patterns of return to Syria, involving risks of instability and the absence of minimum living requirements.
The Situation in Syria
On the other side, intersecting pressures are forcing thousands of refugee families into "emergency returns" to Syria, despite the continued uncertainty regarding suitable conditions. In the absence of sovereign and international guarantees, this return is akin to a "leap into the unknown."
Despite support programs provided by UNHCR and its partners, a sample of returnees reported they had not received any tangible assistance after their return—neither cash grants nor shelter assistance. This reflects the limited reach of support compared to the immense needs in return areas. Their testimonies also revealed structural challenges hindering their ability to settle and remain resilient, reflecting growing fears of an unsustainable return in an environment already suffering from high poverty and unemployment rates. This comes as over 200,000 people have crossed from Lebanon to Syria in recent weeks, according to the UN.
"We returned voluntarily to Syria five months ago, and so far, no one has contacted us, and we haven't received any kind of aid. There is no actual interest or follow-up on the condition of returnees by UNHCR once we cross the border."
_Field Testimony
In this context, return is often associated in the minds of many with a UN financial grant of $100 per individual before return and $600 per family after return. However, reality reveals a troubling failure in the delivery of these funds due to administrative and technical obstacles, leading to delays that may exceed six months, leaving families without a financial safety net.
Regarding the response of Syrian authorities, available information from open sources (including media) indicates that efforts included facilitating the crossing of returnees, organizing their reception at the borders by opening additional halls, providing first aid and primary assistance, and securing transportation in coordination with relevant international organizations. However, reviewed open sources and returnee testimonies do not indicate the provision of a broader protection package—such as housing—beyond organizational and logistical support. Consequently, some returning families have resorted to living in tents, unfinished buildings, or overcrowded dwellings with relatives.
Field data suggests that the impact of these gaps is not limited to the moment of return but extends to the post-arrival phase, where limited support intersects with the fragility of the economic and social environment in return areas.
"I returned to Syria five months ago and haven't seen any support yet. I am a widow with an orphaned daughter; we currently live in a tent without any basic life requirements."
_Field Testimony
Failure of Financial Support Mechanisms
Intersecting indicators from the Digital Trace Listening (DTL) tool, based on a sample of refugees returning from Lebanon to Syria, show that 69% did not receive the $600 USD UN grant, despite their desperate need for it. Testimonies within the sample indicate that some returnees were forced to borrow money to cover return costs, while others based their decision on promises or expectations of receiving the grant, only to later find themselves unable to repay debts or cover rent. Meanwhile, the indicator for risk of homelessness, lack of basic living requirements, and extreme deprivation reached 40% for the same sample.
"We returned to Syria on borrowed money, hoping to get the UN grant. They told us over the phone that they would hand us the amount ($600) at the border, but we saw no one! I also want the UN number in Syria."
_Field Testimony
Communication Channels and Mechanisms
Indicators also show that 51% suffered a total cutoff in communication channels with UNHCR Syria. This percentage is divided between 26% citing technical barriers and 25% reporting a lack of response to requests, inquiries, and follow-up. Additionally, an information gap of 42% was recorded.
"Four months have passed since our return, and no one has contacted us. The number we were given to call in Syria is 'switched off'."
_Field Testimony
Conclusion and Urgent Recommendations
The persistence of these gaps —whether in the failure of communication channels or the absence of basic stabilization programs— does not merely represent a flaw in the response system. It signals waves of reverse displacement and a sharp socio-economic collapse for the most vulnerable, alongside the erosion of institutional legitimacy and a loss of trust in both sovereign and international response systems. Leaving refugees and returnees in a "grey zone" of absent information and protection transforms return from a path to survival into a new phase of the humanitarian crisis.
As an independent civil activist, and based on this data, I present these urgent recommendations to international donors, implementing agencies, and specifically UNHCR:
Reform the Communication System (Lebanon and Syria):
Re-engineer communication channels and activate effective mechanisms that go beyond automated responses and technically complex platforms. This is vital to ensure rapid access for the most vulnerable cases and guide them toward appropriate protection and support paths.
Emergency and Flexible Intervention (Lebanon):
Evacuation Cash Transfers: Provide immediate, independent financial support to refugees trapped in conflict zones to enable them to cover evacuation costs, save their lives, and avoid making uninformed return decisions.
Emergency Shelter Alternatives: Activate rental assistance programs and equip safe shelter centers to ensure that the loss of housing does not become a pressure point driving forced or involuntary return.
Enhancing Post-Return Stability (Syria):
Guarantee Immediate Entitlement: Ensure that cash grants reach returnees immediately upon arrival in Syria and address the cases of those who have not received theirs to ensure a minimum level of financial stability.
Post-Return Follow-up: Establish a field follow-up mechanism that includes livelihood support and basic shelter rehabilitation to ensure the ability of returnees to settle and to mitigate reverse displacement.
Transparency and Accountability:
Clarify Criteria and Procedures: Adopt a more transparent approach in explaining targeting criteria, the timing of aid distribution, and access channels to reduce ambiguity and waiting periods.
Cross-Border Protection: Develop a tracking mechanism that ensures continuity of support and protection from the moment of departure in Lebanon until stabilization in Syria, preventing cases from "falling through the cracks" of coordination gaps.
Digital Tracking Platforms: Launch a digital platform that allows refugees to verify their eligibility status before making a return decision, ensuring they do not rely on unconfirmed information or unguaranteed promises.
Concluding Note:
These field indicators and intersections represent a tool for advocacy and the construction of solutions. To obtain the full version of the indicators or to discuss ways to cooperate in developing response mechanisms based on this methodology, I welcome constructive communication.
Qusay Dali,
April 02, 2026
No. QDS-PUB-P-A02-260401